<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The hunt for the right Passive House windows&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.loadingdock5.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.loadingdock5.com/?p=192</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:15:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.loadingdock5.com/?p=192&#038;cpage=1#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.loadingdock5.com/?p=192#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;assumption #1: As the U-values for a fiberglass frame and a triple gas-filled glass pane are not too different, we used the same U-value for both&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t claim to be a consultant or an expert but if the U-values of the frame and the glass were the same, why would PHPP bother accounting for them separately? The glass performs significantly better than the frame in every PH window I&#039;ve looked at.

&lt;i&gt;assumption #2: Because the NFRC test size for a casement window is 600×1500mm and the frame thickness of the window is known, and assuming that the frames don’t contribute to solar gain, it’s possible to calculate the SHGC for the glass alone.&lt;/i&gt;

Not too bad an assumption, I think, but the out-of-plane depth of the frame can affect the amount of shading.

Fascinating cost info, even for a European!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>assumption #1: As the U-values for a fiberglass frame and a triple gas-filled glass pane are not too different, we used the same U-value for both</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t claim to be a consultant or an expert but if the U-values of the frame and the glass were the same, why would PHPP bother accounting for them separately? The glass performs significantly better than the frame in every PH window I&#8217;ve looked at.</p>
<p><i>assumption #2: Because the NFRC test size for a casement window is 600×1500mm and the frame thickness of the window is known, and assuming that the frames don’t contribute to solar gain, it’s possible to calculate the SHGC for the glass alone.</i></p>
<p>Not too bad an assumption, I think, but the out-of-plane depth of the frame can affect the amount of shading.</p>
<p>Fascinating cost info, even for a European!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.loadingdock5.com/?p=192&#038;cpage=1#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.loadingdock5.com/?p=192#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>Great! Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Holladay</title>
		<link>http://blog.loadingdock5.com/?p=192&#038;cpage=1#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Holladay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.loadingdock5.com/?p=192#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>To read more about Passive House windows, check out this article from GreenBuildingAdvisor:
http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/passivhaus-windows</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To read more about Passive House windows, check out this article from GreenBuildingAdvisor:<br />
<a href="http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/passivhaus-windows" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/passivhaus-windows</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
